Find out if you are actually exploitable, continuously
Continuous Automated Red Teaming (CART) and on-demand pen testing on one platform. Agentic AI emulates real adversary TTPs against your environment, with SOC sign-off workflows for safe execution. Replaces the once-a-year red team exercise with a living, intelligence-led practice.
A regulator-mandated TLPT cycle, in two weeks instead of six
A regulated bank is approaching a TLPT exercise required by its prudential regulator. Traditionally this means contracting a six-week external red team engagement, scoping it manually based on assumptions about likely adversaries, and waiting for the deliverable.
Instead, ScruteX scopes a CART campaign against the same threat actor profile the regulator targets. The campaign executes under SOC oversight in two weeks, with mandatory approval gates before any production-impacting action. Throughout the engagement, validated findings flow into the bank’s ticketing system and detection rules, instead of accumulating into a single end-of-engagement PDF.
The output is audit-ready evidence that satisfies the regulator’s testing framework, plus a continuously running validation programme that compounds over time. The next assessment cycle starts from where this one ended, not from scratch.
Continuous and on-demand
CART runs continuously against your environment using live threat intelligence. Automated pen testing runs on demand or on a schedule, producing point-in-time evidence. Both share the same agentic execution layer.
Continuous Automated Red Teaming
Adversary simulation that runs every day, scoped against active threat actors targeting your sector. Closes the gap between annual point-in-time exercises and ongoing security validation.
Live threat-intel scoping
Engagements are scoped against active threat actors targeting your sector. The CART campaign emulates groups already known to be probing organisations like yours.
Agentic AI execution
Autonomous agents emulate adversary TTPs at scale. Multi-step attack chains run end to end, not as disconnected checks against a fixed playbook.
SOC sign-off workflows
Mandatory approval gates before destructive or production-impacting actions. Your SOC stays in control. Nothing executes without authorisation.
Built-in guardrails
Configurable boundaries on actions, hours, and impact. Blast-radius controls keep CART safe to run against production environments.
Closed-loop findings
Results feed continuous monitoring and ticketing, not a static one-off report. Assessment value compounds instead of expiring with the contract.
MITRE ATT&CK alignment
Every finding maps to ATT&CK techniques. Coverage gaps surface against the actor profile you scoped, with detection improvement guidance attached.
Automated Penetration Testing
Validation on demand and evidence on tap. Trigger before a release or run on a schedule. Findings come back days later, not weeks, with proof-of-concept payloads attached.
Web, API, infrastructure coverage
Full coverage across application and network estate. Web apps, REST and GraphQL APIs, infrastructure layers all in scope on a single engagement.
On-demand or scheduled
Trigger before a major release, run on a quarterly cadence, or both. Scheduled tests catch regression. On-demand tests catch new exposure.
Exploit-backed findings
Every finding includes proof of concept, not just severity. Audit reviewers get evidence that the risk is real, not theoretical.
Audit-ready output
Reports formatted for compliance evidence packages. PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, APRA CPS 234, DORA, and TIBER-EU formats supported.
Differential reporting
Surface what changed since the last test, not what is identical. Quarterly tests do not produce identical 200-page PDFs that nobody reads.
Human expert review available
For regulator-mandated submissions, a qualified practitioner reviews the agentic findings, validates critical attack chains, and co-signs the report.
Why this beats the traditional model
Traditional red teaming is a calendar event. CART is a programme. The difference shows up in what you can act on the day after the engagement ends.
| Traditional red teaming | ScruteX CART |
|---|---|
| Point-in-time exercise once or twice a year | Continuous, intelligence-led, running every day |
| Manual scoping based on assumptions about who might attack | Scoped using live threat intel for your sector and geography |
| Findings sit in a static PDF report | Findings feed directly into continuous monitoring and ticketing |
| Value decays the moment the test ends | Assessment value compounds over time as monitoring continues |
| No link to ongoing detection improvement | Closes the loop with detection rules and ticketed remediation |
Four common deployment patterns
Customers usually start with one of these patterns and expand from there. CART and pen testing share the same execution layer, so the second use case adds no new tooling.
TLPT pre-engagement readiness
CART run pre-engagement identifies gaps, matures the blue team, and reduces the cost and duration of formal TLPT cycles like TIBER-EU and iCAST.
Continuous control validation
Validate that your controls actually work against the TTPs of active threat actors. Find the gaps your last red team report missed.
Pre-release pen testing
Run automated pen tests against staging before each major release. Findings come back in days, not the six weeks a manual engagement takes.
Compliance evidence
Generate audit-ready documentation for PCI DSS, ISO 27001, and other frameworks. Differential reports show closure progress over time.
See CART run against your environment
Book a demo and we'll show you a live CART campaign scoped against the threat actors targeting your sector. Output during the call, not next quarter.